In the case of Twenty20, it
is clear that marketing has played a vital role in changing the perceptions of
the sport. The control process allows performance measures to be included, and
indeed, 9% of adults who say they are not otherwise interested in cricket
follow Twenty20 (MarketResearchWorld, 2008). This shows that the positioning
strategy has been successful, and when evaluated, demonstrates marketing
objective is being achieved. This should therefore guarantee the innovation was
successful, but despite all its commercial success, the long term future of the
game is in doubt. High levels of demand have led to fixture overkill and could
lead to the format loosing consumers. The consequence of this is that the
positioning strategy could fail as the concept would no longer be seen as
exciting, but rather stagnant. There is also an ethical concern as to whether Twenty20
and the way it is marketed are good for cricket. Despite its obvious
revitalisation due to marketing, traditional supports question the need for the
change all together. The argument is that cricket is one of the most
traditional sports in the world, and due to the influence of marketing, is
being ridden of its heritage.
Superb, concise post about the current and future role of marketing in the Twenty20 cricket format. I have also provided comprehensive overviews of major sporting events and Olympic branding. Here is the link to my blog:
ReplyDeletehttp://thetourismguy.wordpress.com